Analysis Of Noun Phrase In English And Vietnamese Education Essay

Examination Of Noun Phrase In English And Vietnamese Education Essay Thing phrases just as different expressions assume a significant job in acing any language. Without thing phrase, there would have no operators, no patients, and no beneficiaries. Also, regardless of how wide our jargon might be, a solitary word is regularly deficient in communicating our idea.. A contrastive examination among English and Vietnamese is essential and fascinating for instructing and considering. Pretty much every language has thing phrases, be that as it may, regardless of having a similar essential structure, they have some differences..This study intends to investigate inside and outside structure of English and Vietnamese thing phrases at that point cause an examination between two sorts of NP just as to recommend some instructing suggestions. I trust through this task, both I and the perusers will get the hang of something supportive which can apply to English educating and learning. Thing phrase in English Definitions : Le (2002) characterized thing phrase (NP) as a gathering of words starting with a thing and working appositive. This NP regularly goes directly previously or directly after the thing it communicates. Ex: A casualty of war, he detested seeing troopers. (A casualty of war = he) As per L.H.Nguyen (2004), a NP is a gathering of words with a thing or pronoun as the primary part (the head). In his book Analyzing English, Jackson included some more arrangement about the head which is the insignificant prerequisite for the event of a thing expression. In spite of the NP is in basic structure, for example, understudies or in complex structure, for example, the anecdote about the young lady who used to live there, it must have a thing or pronoun communicating the primary thought. Structure : Essentially, a thing expression comprises of 3 primary parts : Pre Modification, Head, Post Modification. In any case, in some mind boggling NPs, we can see that the Pre Modification may contain different components. In light of the hypothesis of NP in the book Analyzing English by Howard Jackson, we have a point by point recipe of NP as following : Pre Modification Head Post Modification Pre determiner (A) Identifiers (B) Numeral/Quantifier (C) Modifiers (D) Thing modifier (E) N/master (F) Relative conditions, non-limited provision, prepositional expression, modifiers, verb modifiers. (G) Table 1 : The structure of a NP in English Presently, we will go into subtleties of the structure of a NP. Pre Modification This part essentially has 5 components as appeared in the above table. The main component is pre-determiners. They are a little gathering of words which may happen before the identifier in a NP. They additionally have quantifier reference (all, both, half, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦); part numerals (33%, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦). Next component is identifiers. This component incorporates articles (an, a, the); illustrative (this, that, these, those); possessives (my, your, his,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦). Be that as it may, there is one thing we should focus. In any NP, simply just a single identifier may happen, it implies that articles, decisive and possessives are totally unrelated. We cannot state that my home however on the off chance that we utilization of-express with the possessive pronoun, we can communicate that NP in another way that book of mine. In certain NPs, for example, five felines, a few books, the pre adjustment here is numeral (five) or quantifier(several). Additionally, some of the time, we can see the blend of these two components in certain NPs. The regular arrangements are ordinal numeral (particularly first and last ) + uncertain quantifier ( eg the initial hardly any hours), ordinal + cardinal (eg the second five days), inconclusive quantifier + cardinal numeral, particularly round number (eg a few thousand individuals) (Nguyen, 2004, p. 44). To enhance the head thing here and there, the following component, descriptors, come after the identifier and numerals/quantifiers. In any case, on the off chance that that few descriptive words co-happen in a NP, there is a standard for their request. designation Size shape age shading cause substance present participle enchanting Little round old earthy colored French oaken composing table Table 2 : The modifier request The last component is thing modifiers which interfere with the descriptive words and the head thing. As should be obvious, things may work as heads of NP as well as modifiers in NP. For instance, in NP a youngsters book, kids changes book and a kids book implies a book for kids. Adjacent to 5 essential components referenced above, there is one further sort of pre-alteration that is NP in genitive case. This sort is set apart by a s added to the its last word (eg my companion s bike). Head : The most normal sort of head of NP is thing, yet in certain NPs, for example, She is my closest companion, the head might be a pronoun or the like, generally an individual pronoun (he, she, you㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦). Additionally, Jacobs (1995) expressed that numerous NPs in English are single structures comprising maybe just of a thing or a pronoun. At the point when the head is a pronoun, it doesnt need any change, particularly the pre-adjustment. Sorts of pronoun working as the head Models Individual pronoun He, she, you, they, we, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦. Uncertain pronoun Somebody, something, nobody,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦ Possessive pronoun His, her, your, their,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦ Definite pronoun This, that, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦ Table 3 : Kinds of pronoun working as the head of NP Post-alteration This part is most much of the time followed by expressions or statements. Three sorts of phrasal/clausal post-change we frequently observe is: relative statements, non-limited provisions, and prepositional expressions, once in a while we additionally observe a descriptive word or an intensifier working as a post-modifier in NP (Jackson, p.15). A relative provision comprises of a relative pronoun (who, whom, which, that, whose,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦) as a head, which notices back to the head thing of NP. In the event that the relative pronouns work is object in the relative proviso, we can exclude that relative pronoun. Non-limited proviso is statement normally without subjects presented by a non-limited type of the action word. That sort of statement incorporate 3 sorts : boundless provision, present participle proviso, past participle. In a NP, prepositional expression happens most much of the time working as post-modifier. A few models: All the schools around A B F G (prepositional expression) The most recent couple of days B C F Dong Bang Shin Ki, my preferred music band. F G (appositive NP) My uproarious 4-year-old white Siamese feline B sobriquet age shading F This insidious assessment authorities getting hand NP Genitive D F The Korea history which has recently been distributed. B D F G (relative proviso) Something imperative to do F (inconclusive expert) G (descriptive words) G (non-limited provision) The young lady behind you B F G (intensifier) Two ponies eating grass. A F G (non-limited provision : present participle) A signature tune formed by Lee So Man B E F G (non-limited provision : past participle) 33% of the populace A B F Thing phrase in Vietnamese Definitions : Mai, Vu and Hoang (2006) characterized NP (danh ng㠡⠻â ¯) is an expression where the thing capacity as the primary part. Additionally, NP in the hypothesis of Doan, Nguyen, Pham (2001) is a free blend of a thing core and at least one than one subordinate components which can be front components remaining before the core thing or can be end components remaining after the core thing. Structure : As an expression, NP in Vietnamese likewise has three fundamental parts : Pre-Modification (Front Element), Head (Nucleus), Post-Modification (End Element). Increasingly definite, as indicated by Mai et al. s hypothesis (pp. 276-280), the structure of NP in Vietnamese can be depicted as following : T㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £ nh㠡⠻â ¯ng Cã ¡i con mã ¨o Ä‘en à ¡Ã¢ ºÃ¢ ¥y (- 3) (- 2) (- 1) Head thing (0) (1) (2) Table 4 : The structure of a NP in Vietnamese Front components As should be obvious from the table, the components in the position (- 3), (- 2) and (- 1) are called front components, while the components remaining after the core (1) and (2) are called end components. Those components are set in a steady manner as appeared in the above table. As far as the front components , we have three sorts. In the position (- 1), quantifiers, for example, t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £, t㠡⠺â ¥t th㠡⠺â £y, h㠡⠺â ¿t th㠡⠺â £y, h㠡⠺â ¿t c㠡⠺â £, c㠡⠺â £,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦.are utilized. Those words can happen previously: clear numerals : m㠡⠻â„ ¢t, hai, ba, b㠡⠻‘n,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦ Ex : t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £ b㠡⠻‘n mã†â °Ã£â€ Ã¢ ¡i sinh viã ªn (1) aggregate things : Ä‘ã n, lã… Â ©, bã ³, b㠡⠻â„ ¢, n㠡⠺â ¯m, à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦. Ex: c㠡⠺â £ lã… Â © con trai general things : qu㠡â ºn, à ¡o, binh, lã ­nh, xe c㠡⠻â„ ¢, mã ¡y mã ³c,㠢â‚ ¬Ã¢ ¦ Ex: h㠡⠺â ¿t th㠡⠺â £y mã ¡y mã ³c Lets focus on the quantifiers, for example, t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £, t㠡⠺â ¥t th㠡⠺â £y, h㠡⠺â ¿t th㠡⠺â £y, h㠡⠺â ¿t c㠡⠺â £, cà ¡Ã‚ ºÃ‚ £,à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦.From the models above, we can see that such those quantifiers happen before the head thing. Presently, taking the principal model, is it right in the event that we state it in such a manner b㠡⠻‘n mã†â °Ã£â€ Ã¢ ¡i sinh viã ªn t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £ ? All things considered, regarding language, it is right however the significance is extraordinary. The NP t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £ b㠡⠻‘n mã†â °Ã£â€ Ã¢ ¡i sinh viã ªn implies that no understudies are left, yet in b㠡⠻‘n mã†â °Ã£â€ Ã¢ ¡i sinh viã ªn t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £, there are a few understudies left. In this way, we can infer that t㠡⠺â ¥t c㠡⠺â £ can remain when the head thing relying upon the speakers consideration. Diep Quang Ban (2000) expressed that position (- 2) is the spot taken by word class as following : Clear numeral/cardinal number (t㠡⠻â « ch㠡⠻†° s㠡⠻‘ lã†â °Ã£ ¡Ã¢ »Ã¢ £ng xã ¡c đ㠡⠻†¹nh/s㠡⠻‘ t㠡⠻â «) M㠡⠻â„ ¢t, hai, ba, b㠡⠻‘n, mã†â °Ã£ ¡Ã¢ »Ã¢ i, trã„æ'm à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢ ¦.. Mã†â °Ã£ ¡Ã¢ »Ã¢ i con mã ¨o Gauge